Assessment Methodology

Each pysiQ assessment starts from the same principle: make research-based self-understanding easier to access without pretending to replace a formal evaluation.

That means we adapt published instruments and research frameworks for a clearer online experience, keep the scoring tied to the original constructs where possible, and present the outcome in plain language. The goal is not to force people into a label, but to give them a structured way to recognise patterns, compare domains, and decide whether they want to explore further.

Research basis

The assessments are built from published instruments and research models, including RAADS-R, AQ, and CAT-Q for autism, the 27-item HSP Scale for sensory-processing sensitivity, and ASRS plus DSM-5-aligned criteria for ADHD. We adapt them for online use while keeping the same constructs and, where possible, the same item intent.

How we present results

We present results as profiles, continuum positions, and domain scores rather than as a blunt yes-or-no outcome. Where relevant, multiple assessments can be combined so you can see how patterns overlap in your Blueprint instead of reading each result in isolation.

Results and how to use them

Domain scores show where your responses fall relative to research norms. They are meant for reflection and self-understanding, not as diagnostic labels or fixed cut-offs. Many people use them to clarify their cognitive style, prepare for a conversation with a clinician, or build a fuller picture across assessments.

Key terms

For unfamiliar terms (e.g. masking, sensory sensitivity, executive function), the neurodiversity glossary provides plain-language definitions.

Scoring & privacy

Scoring follows published methods and, where available, reference thresholds from the literature. Raw responses are not tied to your identity unless you choose to save your profile, and you can delete your data at any time in settings.

Limitations

Assessments like these have limits. Mood, context, culture, and interpretation all shape how people answer questions. That is why these tools are best used as a starting point for reflection, not as a replacement for a full professional evaluation.

Why offer assessments like this?

Many people want language for their experience before, during, or instead of a formal evaluation. Long waitlists, cost, and uncertainty can make that difficult. A good self-assessment can help someone organise what they are noticing and decide what to do next.

Research and updates

We keep item pools and scoring aligned with the literature as it evolves. When stronger validation work or revised instruments become available, the methodology is reviewed and updated where appropriate. Each assessment tab above shows the domain logic and key references behind it.